Reflection
Apr. 9th, 2009 06:16 amIf the TSA isn't guilty of something, they would answer my questions.
They haven't answered my questions.
Therefore they must be guilty of something.
They haven't answered my questions.
Therefore they must be guilty of something.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-09 07:10 pm (UTC)The Marcos regime in the Philippines was brought down by a refusal of everyone to cooperate any longer. They just stopped working, blocked the streets, etc. The same was true of the "color" revolutions in several Eastern European countries.
You don't need riots, just the refusal to go along. Remember the sit in at the window factory of a couple of months ago. Things like this used to be a regular feature. It's a rare event now, but it worked. I would imagine that as few as a dozen people who refused to be "processed" in a line for a flight would be enough to cause havoc.
Even paranoid England is starting to reconsider the widespread use of CCTV to monitor streets and businesses. The argument that you have nothing to worry about if you aren't doing anything wrong turns out not be be true. Some innocuous things people would prefer to remain private as well.
It seems as if there is a concerted effort to get people used to the idea of an all-seeing big brother. On the typical spy or action show the good guys can always tap into any database they need, set up surveillance, monitor the movements of people, etc all without any consideration as to whether this legal or proper.