SCA membership
Apr. 2nd, 2009 02:12 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
dsrtaoMy membership in the SCA expires this summer. I'm thinking about not renewing it.
The cons: I would not be allowed to be an officer, including running events. Each event I attended would be $3 more expensive.
The pros: I would make SCA, Inc., a tiny bit unhappy.
The cons: I would not be allowed to be an officer, including running events. Each event I attended would be $3 more expensive.
The pros: I would make SCA, Inc., a tiny bit unhappy.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-02 07:21 pm (UTC)But there are hacks around that, if necessary.
It seems the SCA is starting to lose money, structurally, and might be questioning the membership model, at least a little. I am unsure if dropping your membership now, is good or bad - I guess it depends on whether they stampede, and in which direction.
Overall, an active-in-the-SCA non-member gives the SCA more money than a member. With less responsiveness to the source of that money.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-02 07:53 pm (UTC)But I suspect that you are right, and that I would end up giving them more money. That's all that matters really -- not that I spend the money, but that it goes to them.
Less responsive
Date: 2009-04-02 08:31 pm (UTC)They could be encased in carbonite.